Why I Am Not Going to Orlando

I was recently at a classis committee meeting that was authorizing $200 grants to persons from our classis churches who had registered for the RCA Conversations event to be held in Orlando in February. The grants were to be a dollar-for-dollar match to regional synod grants for that same purpose. Six names were on the list before us, all ministers; by category, one woman, one Korean, one native-American, one specialized minister, five local church pastors. In addition, our classis would likely have three other ministers present: one serving on the General Synod Council, one national staff person, and one serving on a denominational commission meeting concurrently to the event. These latter three persons were not eligible for scholarship as their presence is being underwritten by the denomination and they are serving the event in particular functions. As a group, these nine ministers will bring to the event over two hundred years of experience with RCA ministry in a diversity of venues and cultures. We are fortunate to have them present at the Conversations event. For most of them, it will involve a personal financial cost, even with scholarship assistance, to transport themselves there and back, as well as time away from their ministries.

Several committee members at the meeting expressed surprise that my name was not on the list and that I was not attending the event. I explained that, as a regular delegate to the 2011 General Synod last June, I had carefully studied the plans for the Conversation event, and had directly shared on the floor of General Synod my chief concerns about its purpose, its proposed process and its place in the future planning processes of the denomination. Neither at that point, nor in personal conversations with RCA staff since, have those concerns received any substantive response or satisfactory explanation. These unaddressed concerns, which I detail below, involve orderly church process, openness of participation, cost factors and adequacy of information to be shared at the event. Given the lack of response to them, I simply could not justify any personal participation, although I both hear and appreciate that others can; that their hope is for a classis “voice” to be expressed. My personal choice is to expend time and effort on a classis gathering to envision a local future under Belhar mandates.

The event is extra-ordinary; that is, it falls outside the decision-making process specified in the RCA Book of Church Order. We already have a structure for making our decisions in common; one that we used for the last decade of planning –i.e. the GS.

The process internal to the event suppresses rather than expresses the variety of visions for the future of the denomination. Hearing digests and summations of discussions is not equal to hearing the actual voices themselves. The process is a Temple veil between God’s people assembled and the Holy Spirit.

Participants are asked to envision the future of the RCA without the benefit of examining our past and present learnings. Without a full understanding of where we are, it is impossible to determine where we must go.

The venue, timing and cost limits the participation of RCA folk whose voices we need to hear directly. When heads are counted at Orlando, the vast majority of participants will be ministers with a scattering of lay leaders [elders and deacons]. The genius of RCA polity is the openness [at times near-chaos] of the assembly. Healing happens when the waters churn.

The overall rush to put into operation a second-decade plan is unwise. Not enough time is being allowed for the deep discernment required to articulate our common mission.

Planning by decades is not appropriate to a “black-swan” society, where flexibility is the hallmark of successful institutions. The bias of rushing things is always towards continuing to do what we have been doing because of its familiarity and vested interests.

3 thoughts on “Why I Am Not Going to Orlando

  1. I would like to echo the concerns about cost. It is my feeling that the meeting alienates the voices of those for whom distance and/or cost is an issue. For example, my Canadian colleagues are simply unable to attend due to cost. Personally, I cost it out and it was gong to cost me $2500 to attend (airfare, meals, ground travel, registration). I simply could not justify that cost. The same is true for most of my colleagues who must cross a border. A second example is the dozens (hundreds??) of small churches in the RCA who have a sizeable voice that is often marginalized because $500 is the difference between curriculum for their Sunday School or attending a denominational gathering.
    While I am not prepared to say this was intentional, it does set the Conversations event within the context of those who are wealthy, geographically centred, well networked, or movers and shakers.


    David Vandervelde

  2. David, yours is a very important perspective for us to here. I wonder what consideration was given by the planners to the significant number of Canadian members of the RCA.

    Regarding small churches, that’s my whole classis! We’re a small classis with small churches. We decided to give two scholarships to help give us a voice at this event. That won’t make a great difference there, and certainly not all classes are able to do the same.


  3. I echo Jim’s concerns and want to underline the polity and money issues. Having the “Conversations” set vision for the future usurps the constitutional rights of General Synod, sets our polity of decision by office bearers completely aside, and says publicly, “OK,enough of this inclusive business, it is time to let those with money and agenda run the show”. We have been doing it for some time as “ad hoc” and “mountain top” gatherings have replaced the work of the GS Commissions. With each step we become more a religious franchise seeking consumers of religious product and less a Church.

Leave a Reply to David Vandervelde Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s